On 3/9/20 2:09 PM, Michael Downey wrote: > On Mon, Mar 9, 2020, at 13:59, Pamela Chestek wrote: >> No, you shouldn't. License-review is a burdensome process for the OSI >> and the list participants, so it should be limited to real licenses, not >> thought experiments. License-discuss is for thought experiments. > > There was also something similar submitted recently IIRC; the Vaccine License > was it? >
I still say we should use the Vaccine License as a case example of an unpassable license on our website. -- Josh Berkus _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
