> On Mar 8, 2020, at 1:33 PM, Chris Travers <ch...@metatrontech.com> wrote: > > To clarify I think that any license which demands deference to one > side of a controversial social or political line over another to never > be considered OSI approved. I think that's far more intrusive than > restrictions on how a piece of software may be used. Can you provide an example of an ethical source license that is based on a controversial social or political line? _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
- [License-discuss] Thoughts on the subject of ethical li... Drew DeVault
- Re: [License-discuss] Thoughts on the subject of e... Coraline Ada Ehmke
- Re: [License-discuss] Thoughts on the subject ... Drew DeVault
- Re: [License-discuss] Thoughts on the subj... Chris Travers
- Re: [License-discuss] Thoughts on the subj... Chris Travers
- Re: [License-discuss] Thoughts on the ... Coraline Ada Ehmke
- Re: [License-discuss] Thoughts on... Brendan Hickey
- Re: [License-discuss] Thoughts on... Russell Nelson
- Re: [License-discuss] Thoughts on... Russell McOrmond
- Re: [License-discuss] Thought... Coraline Ada Ehmke
- Re: [License-discuss] Tho... Russell Nelson
- Re: [License-discuss] Tho... Russell McOrmond
- Re: [License-discuss] Tho... Pamela Chestek
- Re: [License-discuss] Tho... McCoy Smith
- Re: [License-discuss] Tho... Russell Nelson
- Re: [License-discuss] Tho... Grahame Grieve