I suggest publishing at IEEE Aerospace. I haven’t been in a couple years but there were several EP papers then.
You just missed an CFP on open hardware but contact the editors: https://www.computer.org/digital-library/magazines/mi/call-for-papers-special-issue-on-agile-and-open-source-hardware If nothing else they can point you at people even if they can’t accept another abstract. Most of the papers will be for open chip design so yours would stand out but they might point you at Aerospace instead. Publishing in social media is great but something like IEEE aerospace is better for documenting what you’ve done and getting a DOI someone can cite. That helps a lot in establishing your expertise...especially in something as niche as EP. I can pass you along to a couple folks if you are interested in collaboration. I don’t know any folks working EP at APL but that doesn’t mean there aren’t any. Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 6, 2020, at 11:42 PM, Michael Bretti <appliedionsyst...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > To Russel Nelson, > > Thank you very much for your suggestions and feedback. I have not heard of > The Incredible Secret Money Machine, but I will definitely look into it. > Also, I think your suggestion on extensive publication falls in line very > well already with my current activities and goals. Right now, I publish > everything I work on extensively and openly across multiple public social > media platforms in great detail, and have been working to synonymize this new > area of ultra-low cost satellite propulsion with the Applied Ion Systems > effort and branding. It does seem like people in industry are taking notice, > and being a relatively small field, word can get around quick. I would > definitely like to be successful, and I think a big part of that is tackling > this interesting grey area of open source hardware development with a very > unconventional approach from the standard accepted practices in the field. I > also feel that being very engaged and involved with the community, as well as > growing a community and following around these efforts itself will help set > this effort apart more uniquely than the typically high barriers raised by > traditional players in the field. Ultimately, the goal is to advance > accessibility of the technology so that any sized or funding-level > nanosatellite team has an opportunity to learn and work with electric > propulsion, as well as students and the hobbyist/maker community. And a big > piece of that is getting this work out there and noticed. What I lack in > funding, I can gain with collaboration, sharing, and an extremely fast and > efficient maker approach! > > Sincerely, > > Michael > > >> On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 4:13 PM Russell Nelson <nel...@crynwr.com> wrote: >> On 3/4/20 2:30 PM, Michael Bretti wrote: >> > 4. How can open source innovation be protected? Especially in my case >> > were I am working on very high-tech systems in a highly competitive, >> > and normally very secretive and non-transparent field, how can I make >> > sure that I get credit, or protect myself from others patenting my >> > designs, and ultimately using them against me, or worst case, >> > completely legally locking me out of working on them myself? >> >> Publish, publish, publish. The better-known your innovation becomes, the >> harder it is for someone to take credit from you or patent your design. >> >> Basically, be successful. That works for two reasons. First, that's what >> you want to do. Second, the more successful you are, the less likely it >> will be that someone will try to steal your ideas. They'll think they >> can do better than you. They'll view your ideas as a challenge to them, >> and they will be unwilling to use your ideas. Lastly, if your idea is >> *really* good, you'll have to push it on people. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> License-discuss mailing list >> License-discuss@lists.opensource.org >> http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org > >> On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 4:13 PM Russell Nelson <nel...@crynwr.com> wrote: >> On 3/4/20 2:30 PM, Michael Bretti wrote: >> > 4. How can open source innovation be protected? Especially in my case >> > were I am working on very high-tech systems in a highly competitive, >> > and normally very secretive and non-transparent field, how can I make >> > sure that I get credit, or protect myself from others patenting my >> > designs, and ultimately using them against me, or worst case, >> > completely legally locking me out of working on them myself? >> >> Publish, publish, publish. The better-known your innovation becomes, the >> harder it is for someone to take credit from you or patent your design. >> >> Basically, be successful. That works for two reasons. First, that's what >> you want to do. Second, the more successful you are, the less likely it >> will be that someone will try to steal your ideas. They'll think they >> can do better than you. They'll view your ideas as a challenge to them, >> and they will be unwilling to use your ideas. Lastly, if your idea is >> *really* good, you'll have to push it on people. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> License-discuss mailing list >> License-discuss@lists.opensource.org >> http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org > _______________________________________________ > License-discuss mailing list > License-discuss@lists.opensource.org > http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
_______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
