On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 5:25 PM McCoy Smith <mc...@lexpan.law> wrote: > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY CCDC ARL (USA) <cem.f.karan....@mail.mil> > >>Sent: Friday, February 28, 2020 12:39 PM > >>To: mc...@lexpan.law; license-discuss@lists.opensource.org > >>Subject: RE: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Resources to discourage > >>governments from bespoke licenses? > > >>Hmmm... OK, I remember that a NOSA 3.0 was being drafted at one time, and I > >>know it got put up on the list. Does anyone want me to go poke at the NASA > >>lawyers to see if they'll push on NOSA 3.0 >>again? Alternatively, does > >>anyone want to push on Congress to do something about copyright law so that > >>the US Government can use the standard, already approved licenses? > > Are you sure about that? I've scanned the archives and don't see anything > about a NOSA 3.0. Just about 2.0. And 2.0 was never approved; the only > approved version is 1.3. The last discussion on NOSA 2.0 was around June of > 2018.
My recollection is that the NASA lawyer mentioned working on a NOSA 3.0 but this version was never submitted for OSI approval and I'm not aware of it being used publicly. I think the various version numbers of NOSA are getting confused in this and other recent threads. Richard _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
