There are, as one might expect, multiple aspects of this idea.
Is it legally enforceable? Not even lawyers can answer that question because it depends (as Larry Rosen once said) on which side of the bed the judge has gotten up on. Probably a better question is whether you intend the new terms to be legally enforceable? Eric makes it clear that enforceability is immaterial since he does not intend it to restrict licensees.
Well, given that, the entire thing is moot. We deal in licenses which give permission to licensees to further sub-license the software. We don't have licenses which do not permit would-be licensees to retrieve or accept ownership of a copy of the software. We don't have licenses which restrict -- in any way -- their use of the software. All of this has been hashed out literally decades ago.
If Eric wants somebody to refrain from using his software, he is free to ask them to refrain. He doesn't need any change in the Open Source licensing regimen. If, however, he ships his software under a modified license, even if that license merely importunes people to not use it, he has removed himself from the Open Source community.
Given that such a discriminatory importunation (that probably wasn't a word until just now) facially violates OSD#5 (or #6, depending), I'm not sure that we should welcome discussion of such a thing on opensource.org mailing lists. It is simply off-topic. Not good, not bad, just off-topic. People might think that we don't hold ALL the terms of the OSD in equal stead. Another thing the valuable and useful Larry Rosen (former OSI lawyer) said is that if you want a judge to believe you, you have to believe yourself. If you don't take yourself seriously, why should the judge?
On 2/20/20 9:16 PM, eric at wwahammy.com (Eric Schultz) wrote:
Over the last few weeks, I've been exploring ideas around ways in which licensing could be used for dealing with unethical behavior in FOSS.
_______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
