Nigel T <nigel.2...@gmail.com>:
> There is a significant difference between deprecating and decertification.
> 
> A deprecated api can still be used.  One removed (aka decertified) cannot.  
> 
> The bar for decertification should be exceedingly high.
> 
> And how is “bad” decided?  Is the limited patent clause in ECL v2 “bad” 
> because it doesn’t go far enough?  This this form of “bad” sufficient for 
> deprecation or even decertification?  
> 
> Should all licenses without an explicit unlimited patent clause be 
> “decertified” as “open source”?
> 
> Deprecation is less damaging although deprecating a license with a 
> significant community is unnecessarily divisive especially when these kinds 
> of decisions are often the result of a small but vocal group more interested 
> in ideological purity than access to code.
> 
> Frankly even deprecation should require more than a simple board vote behind 
> closed doors.  
> 
> De-certification even more so.   
> 
> You’re voting people off the open source island when decertifying.  It should 
> be a long, arduous process requiring many checks.

Before you worry too much about zealotry, maybe you should wait to see
what licenses people choose to try tio deprecate.  I don't look at OSI
and see a collection of ideological nutcases; I am *not* worried.

If you want to be a conservative, anti-decertification voice in these
debates, go to it.  Somebody ought to be.  I don't anticipate myself
taking an extreme strance in either direction.

There are a lot of licenses I would like to see deprecated, but I
can't yet think of one I would instantly decertify.

Personally, I have kind of seized on deprecation as a concept because of cases
like...oh, the PNG Reference Library License.  A perfectly sound and
conformant license that I wouldn't dream of decertifying, but we'd
all be better off if nobody ever used it again, adopting instead some
common license wuth a better-developed interpretive tradition.
-- 
                <a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>



_______________________________________________
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@lists.opensource.org
http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org

Reply via email to