What if a car manufacturer used free software in their car (eg: for the entertainment system, very common), and, then, military or terrorist buy this car, or rent it? they will use free software without even knowing it. Should the car manufacturer put a disclaimer at the start (eg: "warning, you don't have the right to drive this car with evil intention"), or select carefully who can buy their car, or even worse, who can drive it?
[image: PrestaShop] <https://www.prestashop.com/?utm_source=signature&utm_medium=e-mail&utm_campaign=emails-signatures> Antoine Thomas aka ttoine Open Source Evangelist t: +33 (0)6 63 13 79 06 antoine.tho...@prestashop.com On Fri, 21 Feb 2020 at 14:23, Jim Jagielski <j...@jimjag.com> wrote: > > > > On Feb 20, 2020, at 9:16 PM, Eric Schultz <e...@wwahammy.com> wrote: > > > > Instead I've been thinking through ways in which licensing and ethical > FOSS community policies can interact in order to discourage and shame > morally corrupt users. > > So who defines who is "morally corrupt"? Who exactly is a "bad actor"? > What is "evil"? > _______________________________________________ > License-discuss mailing list > License-discuss@lists.opensource.org > > http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org >
_______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
