On Sat, Jan 4, 2020 at 11:47 PM Richard Fontana <rfont...@redhat.com> wrote: > Maybe it would be better for OSI to have the expectation that license > review will only take place some months or years after a license is > already in practical use. Users of new licenses could be expected to > make clear that the licenses are not OSI-approved.
This is a really brilliant proposal that I think we should accept. It would help with license proliferation, and it would probably help prove that we only need five licenses for new works: MIT, ALv2, [A|L]GPLv3+. Thanks, James > > Richard > _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
