No, usage restrictions are incompatible with the Open Source Definition. If the software has such restrictions it cannot be called 'open source'.
On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 6:49 AM Ahmed Hassan <ahas...@rapidsos.com> wrote: > > Hi All: > > I found a software on github that is released under dual licences. Parts of > the software is under Apache licence, the other is under proprietary licence. > The part of the software that's responsible for user access is under > proprietary licence. > > Can someone claim a software to be an open source by restricting number of > users who can access it for self installation? > > -- > Ahmed > _______________________________________________ > License-discuss mailing list > License-discuss@lists.opensource.org > http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
