[Responding on license-discuss] I look forward to you endorsing the CAL, the ISC license, and MPL2 as the only licenses necessary for anyone to use.
More seriously, is this the "only three licenses are necessary" argument, or is there a different set? If so, why? Thanks, Van On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 8:29 PM Bruce Perens via License-review < license-rev...@lists.opensource.org> wrote: > Friday next week at Open Core Summit, I will announce COHERENT OPEN > SOURCE. Let's scrap the Tower of Babel of 100+ Open Source licenses, for a > minimal set, FSF/OSI approved, cross-compatible, that achieves most > purposes of Open Source/Free Software. > -- > Bruce Perens - Partner, OSS.Capital. > _______________________________________________ > License-review mailing list > license-rev...@lists.opensource.org > > http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-review_lists.opensource.org >
_______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
