On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 12:47 PM Bruce Perens via License-discuss < license-discuss@lists.opensource.org> wrote:
The OSD rules don't protect your private activities from the terms of Open > Source licenses. > I think that OSD #3 does exactly that. "The license must allow modifications and derived works [...]" A license that even conditionally forbids those activities is not, on my reading, an open source license. John Cowan http://vrici.lojban.org/~cowan co...@ccil.org "The exception proves the rule." Dimbulbs think: "Your counterexample proves my theory." Latin students think "'Probat' means 'tests': the exception puts the rule to the proof." But legal historians know it means "Evidence for an exception is evidence of the existence of a rule in cases not excepted from."
_______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
