>>From: License-discuss [mailto:license-discuss-boun...@lists.opensource.org] >>On Behalf Of Simon Phipps >>Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2019 9:06 AM >>To: license-discuss@lists.opensource.org >>Subject: Re: [License-discuss] For Discussion: Cryptographic Autonomy License >>(CAL) Beta 2
>>Can you explain why this is "problematic" in relation to OSD 9 please >>Richard? To my eyes the phrase "any modifications, elaborations, or >>implementations created by You that contain any licenseable >>portion of the >>Work" clearly bounds the effect to derivations of the licensed software and >>not to unrelated software distributed alongside. That was my reaction as well. Although I dislike use of the noun “elaborations” (what is that intended to encompass?) and assume “implementations” is intended to capture a reciprocal effect via patents?
_______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
