VanL dixit:
>And just so the actual scope is not further misconstrued, you only have to
>give the owner of the data an option to get a copy if the owner of the data
>has also received the software, or a portion thereof, or been a recipient
>of the services provided by the software from you.
This requires tracking of who’s really the “owner” of the data, and
whether those conditions are met… often undue burden.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
(gnutls can also be used, but if you are compiling lynx for your own use,
there is no reason to consider using that package)
-- Thomas E. Dickey on the Lynx mailing list, about OpenSSL
_______________________________________________
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@lists.opensource.org
http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
