On 2019-07-03 1:34 p.m., Scott Peterson wrote:

If the Open Source Initiative was a trade association tasked with providing efficient, clear determinations of what did and did not conform to some standard that had been agreed among competitors in an industry, then it would be important for the organization to have detailed processes by which determinations are made, and it could make sense for the organization to actively create guidance that makes clear how the latest factors of current interest in the industry affect how products will fit with respect to the lines around the definition.

But that is not the role of the Open Source Initiative.
The document that is the Open Source Definition is a tool, not an end in itself.
One formalistic view of what drives the OSI can be seen in its bylaws.
https://opensource.org/bylaws

For me, the relevance of this observation developed as I watched license-discuss@ and license-review@ over the last many months. While not directly on topic for the ongoing threads, I see this observation as continuing have sufficient relevance (albeit on the edges of what is being discussed) that I have finally decided to post this comment.

I am not sure if the OSI's behaviour is predicated by its organizational structure. In my opinion the main obstacle to more detailed processes (and many other activities it could perform within its remit) is a lack of resources. Over the past 20 years open source has gone from a crazy idea to how the world works, and expecting the OSI to fulfill a worldwide, technology-industry-wide, mainstream mission with a volunteer board and 1.5 staff is not realistic.

So in my opinion, the major difference if the OSI was a trade association is that it would (perhaps) have the resources commensurate with its mission. So if you're reading this and your employer is notlisted as a sponsor <https://opensource.org/sponsors>, please consider asking your management to support the OSI's mission via a donation.



_______________________________________________
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@lists.opensource.org
http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org

Reply via email to