On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 1:05 PM Richard Fontana <rfont...@redhat.com> wrote:
> I believe one could reasonably argue that a reimplementation of an API > (necessarily copying the supposed expressive elements of the API) does > not fit this definition (even if it would fit the folk notion of > derivative work that the free software/open source community largely > seems to subscribe to). > Quick clarification: Did you mean that "one could reasonably argue that a reimplementation... *fits* this definition" but that the folk notion *rejects* it? Or did you mean that a reimplementation *does not fit* this definition" (as you wrote it) but that the folk notion *accepts* that a reimplementation is a derivative work?
_______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
