On Tue, May 28, 2019, 15:42 Smith, McCoy <mccoy.sm...@intel.com> wrote:
> *>>From:* License-discuss [mailto: > license-discuss-boun...@lists.opensource.org] *On Behalf Of *VanL > *>>Sent:* Tuesday, May 28, 2019 12:32 PM > *>>To:* license-discuss@lists.opensource.org > *>>Subject:* [License-discuss] Government licenses > > > > > > >>As he described it, goverment-written code is all public domain. > Unfortunately, the predominant effect of that public domain status for the > code was that government contractors would take the code, make trivial > modifications, and sell it back to >>the government under a proprietary > license - which they were within their rights to do. > > > > But if it’s public domain, the government has no right to dictate how > those modifications are subsequently licensed. That’s sort of the whole > point of public domain. > It's far more confusing than that. Works by the United States government are in the public domain only in the United States. "The prohibition on copyright protection for United States Government works is not intended to have any effect on protection of these works abroad. Works of the governments of most other countries are copyrighted. There are no valid policy reasons for denying such protection to United States Government works in foreign countries, or for precluding the Government from making licenses for the use of its works abroad." https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Copyright_Law_Revision_(House_Report_No._94-1476)
_______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
