> Once in a while someone here suggests the OSI adopt an official > de-listing procedure (beyond the existing limited possibility for > license steward deprecation). I'd like to propose that the OSI board > reconsider this idea, so that a *very* small number of licenses > approved earlier in the OSI's history can be reexamined, at the > initiative of any community member, to see whether they should be > removed from the approved list, whether because the license was likely > approved in error, or (and this would probably be even more unusual) > because software freedom values have evolved sufficiently to make the > past approval inappropriate today. I realize that adopting a > de-listing procedure raises its own predictability-related policy > concerns. >
I'd like to suggest as a first step the board could decide to approach the license stewards of the mentioned two licenses, and ask whether they are willing to voluntarily retire the licenses. Even if they may reject such a request, this would already send a signal that appealing to these licenses as precedent is probably not going to help your case here. Note that the stewards to these licenses also have an incentive to agree to a kind request: They could for example motivate voluntary de-listing with generic license proliferation concerns and avoid a later public statement by the OSI that their license (and software) specifically violated OSD all the time. A second step could then be to move them into a "not recommended" category, where the OSI acknowledges that software has been released in good faith as open source under this license, but new software projects shouldn't consider these licenses, (and we regret our past mistake). To outright de-list an existing license is of course problematic in many ways. Such action should probably begin with a review with what software is still released with the license, and who is using (including re-distributing) that software. As the RPL and APL aren't considered free by the FSF anyway, I expect that the answer in any case excludes Linux distributions and users, and may turn out to be a very small population indeed. henrik -- henrik.i...@avoinelama.fi +358-40-5697354 skype: henrik.ingo irc: hingo www.openlife.cc My LinkedIn profile: http://fi.linkedin.com/pub/henrik-ingo/3/232/8a7 _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
