One solution could be anonymous voting by OSI members for license approval in
addition to a discussion period.
On 5/20/19, 9:07 AM, "License-discuss on behalf of Pamela Chestek"
<license-discuss-boun...@lists.opensource.org on behalf of
pam...@chesteklegal.com> wrote:
On 5/19/19 5:23 PM, Henrik Ingo wrote:
> Statistically, you may be right, but I'd still like to challenge this.
> It is my belief that the list is merely functioning efficiently. I
> often read review discussions, and if I agree with the
> majority/consensus, I stay silent. It doesn't mean I'm not active.
That may be true of you, but there are some bullies on the lists. That
means that some who disagree may be silent because they don't want to be
bullied. So we can't assume that silence means agreement.
Pam
Pamela S. Chestek
Chestek Legal
PO Box 2492
Raleigh, NC 27602
+1 919-800-8033
pam...@chesteklegal.com
www.chesteklegal.com
_______________________________________________
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@lists.opensource.org
http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
_______________________________________________
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@lists.opensource.org
http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
