Quoting Bruce Perens (br...@perens.com): > You're asking the people who are charged with voting to make a decision to > also state the *official *position of the organization. Pick one.
I actually meant to say that perhaps those with OSI Board or other official status should clarify who they are, not that they need to state what is the official position of the organisation. Obviously, the latter gets articulated by voting and official minutes. (To be clear, I cannot see that there is any such problem, and IMO this alleged issue has a troubling resemblance to passive-aggressive gamesmanship -- but said that _if_ there is a perceived problem of lack of clarity as to who is entitled to speak, collectively, for OSI, then the obvious remedy is identification.) -- Cheers, "I am a member of a civilization (IAAMOAC). Step back Rick Moen from anger. Study how awful our ancestors had it, yet r...@linuxmafia.com they struggled to get you here. Repay them by appreciating McQ! (4x80) the civilization you inherited." -- David Brin _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
