As an Eclipse user I don't really care if there are any other projects...it's a
large ecosystem by itself and there is strong community support for it.
And cathedral is every bit as valid a development style as bazaar for open
source.
Nigel
On 1/10/19, 10:27 AM, "License-discuss on behalf of Thorsten Glaser"
<license-discuss-boun...@lists.opensource.org on behalf of t...@mirbsd.de>
wrote:
Mike Milinkovich dixit:
> On 2019-01-09 5:16 p.m., John Cowan wrote:
>> Foundation.B Wikipedia lists only four beyond the four you mentioned:
ksh,
>> graphviz, Jikes, and UWIN.
And ksh and UWIN come from (well originally, ksh93 was forked)
the same source tree.
> But until or unless the OSI changes its criteria, I will continue to
assert
> that the EPL is supported by a strong community.
No.
The EPL is supported by a strong foundation (centralised)
but has virtually no support from the community (bazaar,
individual non-Eclipse-affiliated developers using it).
bye,
//mirabilos
--
“The final straw, to be honest, was probably my amazement at the volume of
petty, peevish whingeing certain of your peers are prone to dish out on
d-devel, telling each other how to talk more like a pretty princess, as
though
they were performing some kind of public service.” (someone to me,
privately)
_______________________________________________
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@lists.opensource.org
http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
_______________________________________________
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@lists.opensource.org
http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
