Peter Corless dixit: >Party C, meanwhile, can do whatever they want to the OSS, since they have >no legal license obligation back to Party A. Their access is provided
Yes, of course: the act of running the program is not restricted, and the user only interfaces with it. >through Party B. They could, theoretically, violate the license Party A >distributed their software under, since they are just using it. No, for two reasons: 1. Without a licence, a person does not have any rights in a work. 2. Even so, if the person receives a copy of the work, the licence is attached to it. In a “cloud user” scenario, they don’t get access to the work itself (software), just interface with it via an API of some sort. bye, //mirabilos -- I believe no one can invent an algorithm. One just happens to hit upon it when God enlightens him. Or only God invents algorithms, we merely copy them. If you don't believe in God, just consider God as Nature if you won't deny existence. -- Coywolf Qi Hunt _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
