2006/1/31, demerphq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 1/31/06, Reini Urban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 2006/1/31, demerphq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > IMO we should be bundling some of the base modules from the libwin > > > distro in core. Win32API::File being one of them, along with > > > Win32API::Registry and Win32::TieRegistry, Win32::IPC, Win32::EventLog > > > (the latter becuae we bundle *NIX specific counterparts so why should > > > Win32 be left out?) > > > > Ok for all (esp. Win32API:: and IPC). > > But not Win32::TieRegistry please! > > This is very high-level and pollutes the namespace with a magic global. > > Only if you dont tell it to do otherwise. See the TiedRef parameter. > > And personally I think high-level in this area is a good idea. > > Are you really going to say that youd prefer to use Win32API::Registry > instead of Win32::TieRegistry (which is as you said a wrapper around > Win32API::Registry)
High-level is of course ok. I love Win32::TieRegistry and never used Win32API::Registry directly. But putting it into core would be very dirty, with the current TiedRef default. -- Reini Urban http://phpwiki.org/ http://spacemovie.mur.at/ http://helsinki.at/
