On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 16:33, Peter Krempa wrote: > AFAIK this change comes from oVirt. They recently started to use > persistently defined VMs for their actions, but they define them before > use. And undefine them after done. > > I presume that they delete all inactive persistent VMs they find as > a way to "clean up" after themselves rather than just those they've > created. > > I presume their rationale is that oVirt is the only thing that should > deal with libvirt on the oVirt hypervisor node, but that sounds flawed.
Thank you for your help, I managed to find the offending lines in the log and, yes, unfortunately you seem to be right. I will take it up in the oVirt bug tracker. Thanks again, Andy
_______________________________________________ libvirt-users mailing list libvirt-users@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users
