重启服务器后,root下virt-manager能执行了,我看你的帐号还不行。

 

发件人: Allen Qiu [mailto:my1st...@163.com] 
发送时间: 2014年10月27日 16:31
收件人: libvirt-users@redhat.com
抄送: 王成武; 'Bin Liu'; zoubinbin...@163.com
主题: What is the difference between running "virt-manager" and "sudo 
virt-manager"?

 

Hi all,

 

What is the difference between starting virt-manager by "virt-manager" and by 
"sudo virt-manager"? It seems that there are two copy of virt-manager running 
in the background. 

 

When I run "virt-manager", I got a error of "Unable to open a connection to the 
libvirt management daemon. Libvirt URI is: qemu:///system Verify that: - The 
'libvirtd' daemon has been started". 

 

Whereas when I run "sudo virt-manager", I got a error of "Error starting 
Virtual Machine Manager: Failed to contact configuration server; some possible 
causes are that you need to enable TCP/IP networking for ORBit, or you have 
stale NFS locks due to a system crash. See  <http://projects.gnome.org/gconf/> 
http://projects.gnome.org/gconf/ for information."

 

How should I deal with the two issues respectively? Is there any drawback by 
simply running "virt-manager"?

 

Regards,

 

Allen

 

2014-10-27

  _____  

Allen Qiu

_______________________________________________
libvirt-users mailing list
libvirt-users@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users

Reply via email to