I'm writing Go bindings, I was just wondering about PowerVM, maybe further ahead if nobody has done it I could give it a try. So, Does it mean the other functions more granular funtions are going to be deprecated at some point?
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 10:18 PM, Daniel P. Berrange <berra...@redhat.com>wrote: > On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 07:44:47PM -0500, Camilo Aguilar wrote: > > Hey guys, > > > > I'm so glad you added the new set of virConnectListAllDomains functions, > it > > simplifies a lot our work!. I was only wondering why there is no support > > for PowerVM. Is it that it hasn't been developed or is there some > technical > > hardship? > > I believe it was probably just an oversight - our intention was that the > new API worked with all drivers. Feel free to send a patch for phyp if > you think you can manage to write the code. > > Daniel > -- > |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/:| > |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org:| > |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/:| > |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc:| >
_______________________________________________ libvirt-users mailing list libvirt-users@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users
