Ah great, thanks! Alex
On 16 April 2013 09:55, Michal Privoznik <mpriv...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 16.04.2013 10:34, Alex Leonhardt wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > Am new to this list, and have asked in #ovirt / ovirt-users list and > > they pointed me to here ... I've seen libvirtd using ~11 GB of resident > > memory after the host has been running for about 60+ days with about 40 > > VMs running on it. > > > > The versions I'm currently running are : > > > > libvirt.x86_64 0.9.10-21.el6_3.7 > > libvirt-client.x86_64 0.9.10-21.el6_3.7 > > libvirt-lock-sanlock.x86_64 > > libvirt-python.x86_64 0.9.10-21.el6_3.7 > > > > I know I can just restart libvirtd and "all should be fine" (and > > hopefully I'll regain the 11GB of memory) - however, is there an updated > > version that maybe fixes a memory leak ?? > > Yes. John Ferlan did a great job in hunting memory leaks down. Most of > his fixes went to 1.0.3, some into 1.0.4 or even 1.0.2. > > Michal > -- | RHCE | Sen Sys Engineer / Platform Architect | www.vcore.co | www.vsearchcloud.com |
_______________________________________________ libvirt-users mailing list libvirt-users@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users
