2011/7/6 Laine Stump <[email protected]>:
> On 07/06/2011 07:31 AM, Matthias Bolte wrote:
>>
>> 2011/7/6 Laine Stump<[email protected]>:
>>>
>>> Otherwise this will leak an fd each time one of these functions is
>>> called.
>>> ---
>>>  src/util/interface.c |   36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>>>  1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>> +
>>> +err_exit:
>>> +    VIR_FORCE_CLOSE(fd);
>>> +    return rc;
>>>  }
>>
>> HACKING suggests to call the label cleanup instead of err_exit in both
>> functions.
>
>
> Yeah, but all the other functions in that file had err_exit, and I wanted to
> be consistent within the file, but didn't want to rename everything.
>
>
>> ACK, with the labels renamed.
>
> Only if you'll ACK a separate patch that renames the other labels :-)

Oh, I didn't notice that. All err_exit in there qualify for being
renamed to cleanup, so there's no reason why I wouldn't ACK such a
patch :)

-- 
Matthias Bolte
http://photron.blogspot.com

--
libvir-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to