On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Lassi Tuura <l...@cern.ch> wrote: > Compared to current head, I see consistent slightly over 5% slow-down with > the patch > in our memory profiler, using the same test I used previously. The 387M stack > walks > in ~960 secs become about ~1011 seconds with the patch. I don't think there > are any > ms_abi frames.
Thanks for testing. Probably the effect of a bigger dcache footprint. I'm inclined to apply the patch, but disable it by default. > > Under what conditions would ms_abi support / preserving SSE register state be > enabled? > The matches I found in google codesearch were basically cygwin, wine and some > EFI code. Ariel? -Arun _______________________________________________ Libunwind-devel mailing list Libunwind-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libunwind-devel
