On 2015-07-24 23:32, Greg Jung wrote: > On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Peter Rosin <p...@lysator.liu.se > <mailto:p...@lysator.liu.se>> wrote: >> >> [ mingw-users: this is in reply to a suggested patch (1) ] >> >> On 2015-07-23 19:30, fabrizio...@tiscali.it >> <mailto:fabrizio...@tiscali.it> wrote: >> > Hello, >> > when using the MSYS2 shell (http://msys2.github.io/), uname -o returns >> Msys instead of mingw32. The latest versions of config.guess and config.sub >> already support that, but Libtool doesn't. Here's a patch to add that >> support. >> >> This does not feel correct as a quick glance. Are you sure you >> understand what you are doing? >> >> In normal operation, I would have assumed that msys2 returns >> mingw-something and that any msys mode was a special case for >> building binaries with the cygwin/posix emulation layer, but >> you are adding msys to a bunch of places which are mingw-only. >> So, it all feels fishy. >> >> Also, how does this affect msys1? >> >> Cheers, >> Peter >> >> (1) http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool/2015-07/msg00003.html > In all three of my msys2 XXX_shell.bat shells, uname -o answers Msys. > in msys-1, uname -o answers Msys > > The query that gets you to mingw32 is "uname -s" > > In MSYS2: > greg@Homerw7 MSYS ~ > $ uname -s > MSYS_NT-6.1 > > greg@Homerw7 MINGW32 ~ > $ uname -s > MINGW32_NT-6.1 > > greg@Homerw7 MINGW64 ~ > $ uname -s > MINGW64_NT-6.1 > > In Mingw/MSYS from mingw.org <http://mingw.org>: > greg@Homerw7 ~ > $ uname -s > MINGW32_NT-6.1 > > In Cygwin it looks like so: > > greg@Homerw7 ~ > $ uname -o > Cygwin > > greg@Homerw7 ~ > $ uname -s > CYGWIN_NT-6.1
Oh, "uname -o". I didn't notice that. But I also do not see any reference to "uname -o" in the latest config.sub/config.guess. So, someone is confused. Is it me? Cheers, Peter _______________________________________________ https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
