On 17/10/12 05:41, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > Another consideration is that rolling Libtool into Automake would make > using Libtool as a standalone script rather more difficult. Having > said that, my impression is that Libtool is rarely used that way in > any case, and further simplification may be possible by deliberately > dropping explicit support for that use case.
I use libtool regularly, but never automake. I suspect this use case is more common than is evident, because (as mentioned in another reply) it is typically in non-public build tools. But I have no proof of that. So, at least on a personal level, I am strongly opposed to rolling libtool into automake. John Bytheway _______________________________________________ https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
