[ adding automake-patches, replies can drop libtool@ ] * Adam Mercer wrote on Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 09:03:53PM CEST: > On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 13:44, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
[ automake support for cuda ] > > I'd love to have this, and there has been a patch for this, too > > (and I think it was reasonably good), but again, the copyright > > question could not be cleared up so we have to ignore the patch. > > > > If you are willing to code up a patch for this, and to assign > > copyright to the FSF, then be my guest. > > I'll take a look but can't promise anything. I have no objection with > assigning copyright to the FSF as this will make things much easier in > the future. > > Where would be an appropriate place to start in looking at adding this > support? Check out the Automake git tree, find the patch in the git log that added UPC support. Or the discussion on the automake-patches list. It's probably almost as simple as s/UPC/CUDA/ s/upc/cuda/ plus adjusting some blurbs and the actual compile rule, once you know how it should look like. Cheers, Ralf _______________________________________________ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
