* Andy Wingo wrote on Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 11:39:01AM CET:
> On Thu 13 Nov 2008 21:46, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > What I don't understand is: your --config output had
> > | hardcode_direct=no
> >
> > so something set this to "yes" in the meantime. That bit is wrong.
> > Any chance the package you are building is using a patched ltmain.sh
> > file?
>
> I don't think anything is patching ltmain.sh, no. And while I'm pretty
> sure that I did invoked ./libtool --config correctly before, now it's
> giving me different results -- I must have done something to it in the
> meantime (but I really don't know what), or invoked it incorrectly.
> (This bug still manifests itself in the same way though.) Attaching the
> --config log.
Let's take a look at the differences of the two --config outputs:
| +# Assembler program.
| +AS=as
|
| +# DLL creation program.
| +DLLTOOL=dlltool
|
| -$ ./libtool --config
| +# Object dumper program.
| +OBJDUMP=objdump
So one of them used win32-dll (aka AC_LIBTOOL_WIN32_DLL), while the
other did not.
| @@ -115,7 +16,7 @@
| build_libtool_libs=yes
|
| # Whether or not to build static libraries.
| -build_old_libs=yes
| +build_old_libs=no
Huh? Did you rerun configure with --disable-static?
| @@ -176,9 +77,6 @@
| reload_flag=" -r"
| reload_cmds="\$LTCC \$LTCFLAGS -nostdlib \${wl}-r -o \$output\$reload_objs"
|
| -# An object symbol dumper.
| -OBJDUMP="false"
| -
See above.
| @@ -201,7 +99,7 @@
| LTCC="gcc"
|
| # LTCC compiler flags.
| -LTCFLAGS="-I/opt/yobuild/include -g -O0"
| +LTCFLAGS="-I/opt/yobuild/include -O -g -gstabs+3 -std=gnu89"
Did you reconfigure with different CFLAGS set?
| @@ -303,10 +201,10 @@
| hardcode_into_libs=no
|
| # Compile-time system search path for libraries.
| -sys_lib_search_path_spec="/usr/lib/i686-apple-darwin9/4.0.1 /usr/lib
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-apple-darwin9/4.0.1 /usr/local/lib"
| +sys_lib_search_path_spec="/lib /usr/lib /usr/local/lib"
|
| # Run-time system search path for libraries.
| -sys_lib_dlsearch_path_spec="/usr/local/lib /lib /usr/lib"
| +sys_lib_dlsearch_path_spec="/lib /usr/lib"
Hmm.
| @@ -401,7 +299,7 @@
|
| # Set to "yes" if using DIR/libNAME${shared_ext} during linking hardcodes
| # DIR into the resulting binary.
| -hardcode_direct=no
| +hardcode_direct=yes
Hmm.
| @@ -453,24 +351,3 @@
| # How to hardcode a shared library path into an executable.
| hardcode_action=immediate
|
| -# The directories searched by this compiler when creating a shared library.
| -compiler_lib_search_dirs=""
| -
| -# Dependencies to place before and after the objects being linked to
| -# create a shared library.
| -predep_objects=""
| -postdep_objects=""
| -predeps=""
| -postdeps=""
| -
| -# The library search path used internally by the compiler when linking
| -# a shared library.
| -compiler_lib_search_path=""
Hmm.
Doesn't ring an obvious bell yet. Can you try to configure and make
this package anew, in a clean build directory tree?
Thanks,
Ralf
_______________________________________________
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
