Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Roberto Bagnara wrote on Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 09:40:25PM CET:
I have a project that builds several libraries. For most of them,
both the shared and static versions make sense, so I don't want
to use AC_DISABLE_STATIC. However, for some of them the static
version does not make any sense. How can I avoid the overhead
of building the static version of those?
libfoo_la_LIBTOOLFLAGS = --tag=disable-static
Hi Ralf,
we were already doing that, but this did not prevent compiling
the sources that are only determined at configure time.
I had thus to use
AM_LIBTOOLFLAGS = --tag=disable-static
in the Makefile.am of the directory involved.
Thanks,
Roberto
--
Prof. Roberto Bagnara
Computer Science Group
Department of Mathematics, University of Parma, Italy
http://www.cs.unipr.it/~bagnara/
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool