On Sunday 13 April 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Richard Purdie wrote on Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 08:53:10PM CEST: > > The patches we're using are publicly available as: > > http://svn.o-hand.com/view/poky/trunk/meta/packages/libtool/libtool-1.5.1 > >0/ > > uclibc.patch - Tweaks to libtool.m4 to support uclibc > > If this happens to be needed for 2.2.2 as well, I'd like this one > submitted to libtool-patches, ideally including a ChangeLog entry > and testsuite results for this system, thanks.
it depends. as things stand today, no it is not needed. this is because there is a "linux*" match which sets the dep check method to pass_all. historically the "linux*" match was not set to pass_all which meant we add to add a uClibc target. so, so long as "linux*" remains "pass_all", there is no need for uClibc/dietlibc/whatever-libc specific checks. perhaps we could insert a comment into the current m4 code to this effect ? -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
