Hi Eric, * Eric Blake wrote on Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 02:04:05PM CET: > According to Ralf Wildenhues on 2/25/2008 11:58 PM: > |> I believe that backward compatability has been mostly respected. > | > | Yes, but just running libtoolize has never been enough. Running aclocal > | (with Libtool 2.2's macro files visible to aclocal) to get the new macro > | definitions is also needed; autoreconf -vf takes care of both. > > Although when upgrading m4 to a newer version of libtool, we noticed that > autoreconf runs aclocal prior to libtoolize, which is probably the wrong > order. We still need to investigate whether autoconf should switch that > order.
autoreconf should run aclocal both before and after libtoolize. It does a certain amount of short-cutting, though. If there is a bug you can reproduce (time stamps are important!) I'm all ears. Cheers, Ralf _______________________________________________ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
