Hello Richard, * Richard Hacker wrote on Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 01:39:31PM CET: > On Thursday 10 January 2008 08:29, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > For whatever output is left done by libtool I expect that whoever want's > > it silenced hard enough will have enough motivation to send a patch to > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > That shouldn't bee too difficult.
Misunderstanding again, this time my fault, sorry. What I meant was: even with make -s LIBTOOLFLAGS=--silent there will be some leftover output done by libtool. If somebody wants to fix that, be invited to provide a (complete) patch (best including testsuite amend; the stresstest in Libtool HEAD would probably come in handy). If you want all tools silenced which are called by make, then I suggest to simply use make >/dev/null || make Eric already mentioned the portability issue with your patch. Hope that helps. Cheers, Ralf _______________________________________________ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
