On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 00:25 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hi Ralf, thank you for testing!
> Further, the indiscriminate use of ldd, or absolute file names in the > test of course prevents decent cross-compile results. (Not that this > is much of a regression, the problem existed before.) > > Ideally, I would like, in a system that also uses symlinks, to see > both the symlink and the real dir present in the search path. > > We should consider just making this whole setting overridable at > configure time. which makes me think maybe doing the simple thing: <crap> sys_lib_dlsearch_path_spec64='/lib64 /usr/lib64' sys_lib_dlsearch_path_spec32='/lib32 /usr/lib32' sys_lib_dlsearch_path_specfoo='/lib /usr/lib' if 32bitbuild sys_lib_dlsearch_path_spec="$sys_lib_dlsearch_path_spec32 $sys_lib_dlsearch_path_specfoo $sys_lib_dlsearch_path_spec64 $lt_ld_extra" else sys_lib_dlsearch_path_spec="$sys_lib_dlsearch_path_spec64 $sys_lib_dlsearch_path_specfoo $sys_lib_dlsearch_path_spec32 $lt_ld_extra" fi </crap> all inside an AC_CACHE_VAL() (that sets and tests an lt_cv_var) so it can be overridden and so forth, is the best plan. Sigh, indeed. If you think that a 1.5.26 release is urgent, I won't insist that you wait on this. Thanks, Peter _______________________________________________ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
