Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > The profiling support might not be thread safe. While it may seem > counter-productive to program tuning, it is usually recommended to use > limited optimization, or no optimization at all.
I have an option for my program to use no threads and the same results were produced. Incidentally, this earlier comment, > and functions showed up on the profiling list > that _shouldn't have been called_, while ones which _should_ have been > weren't. was a reference to that, and was incorrect. The right functions show up, just not any within the library. If I try to run gprof on the library file itself, I just get the output, /: Success Anyway, my guess is I've exhausted libtool-related queries so I'll take this over to the gprof people and ask their advice. Thanks to everyone for your helpful comments! _______________________________________________ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
