Ralf Wildenhues <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Markus, > > * Duft Markus wrote on Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 05:28:41PM CET: >> >> Sorry, i must correct myself. $EXEEXT *is* used *sometimes* and as >> far as my situation is concerned, completely in the wrong places... > > Well, it matches the Cygwin semantics of .exe interpolation: > <http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/using-specialnames.html#id4729824>. > > The other missing bit of data is that on Cygwin and MinGW, a C wrapper > foo/tagdemo.exe for foo/.libs/tagdemo.exe is also created in addition > to the shell wrapper foo/tagdemo. > > You don't describe your situation sufficiently well for somebody > else to do anything about it. Do you use Cygwin, MinGW, or Interix? > Native or cross-compile + simulator? What semantics does the system > in question have wrt. suffix interpolation? Find out about those > semantics and post the link to its documentation. How come you don't > post the actual verbose test failure output, so we could see which > tests have the problem? >
The compiler i use is WGCC (still @ sourceforge ;o)) which i wrote myself. The sematics for executable extensions are configurable, which means one can set the default output filename in a configuration file. The current default set by me is a.exe (like gcc...). It was a.out, but that cause lots and lots of troubles with windows ;o// i will look further into porting my patches to Interix/WGCC. >> I don't claim to have found a solution for this, but at least for >> now, and for me i got a workaround.... > > Which you didn't post either (as a patch). :-( > The workaround is to remove $EXEEXT from all the test files and therefore patch defs.in to check for both files, one with and one without exe extension. I know thet this is probably not a really good solution (i attached the patch...). I didn't look at all tests by now, so there may be others still having EXEEXT in them. I additionally don't know if i can use $EXEEXT or @EXEEXT@ on defs.m4sh so i for now just hardcoded the .exe... Cheers, Markus > Cheers, > Ralf
test-suite.patch
Description: test-suite.patch
_______________________________________________ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
