On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 08:05:45AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hi Albert, > > * Albert Chin wrote on Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 07:37:11AM CEST: > > On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 07:25:32AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 02:03:49PM CET: > > > > * Albert Chin wrote on Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 11:49:35PM CET: > > > > > On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 10:19:27AM +0100, Roger While wrote: > > > > > > Libtool 1.5.22 > > > > > > There is a problem on HP-UX 64 bit when using gcc. > > > > > > Problem is at line 3167 in libtool.m4 : > > > > > > _LT_AC_TAGVAR(hardcode_libdir_flag_spec_ld, $1)='+b $libdir' > > > > > > > > > > > > gcc doesn't like that ! > > > > > > We can ditch hardcode_libdir_flag_spec_ld for HP-UX. > > > > > > > > In the C++ case, yes, but for some HP-UX cases we use $LD still. > > > > and we still need to revisit the choice of $CC vs $LD based upon > > > compiler version, not HP-UX version. > > > > Why? For HP-UX 11.00 and above, why would you ever use $LD? > > See this thread: > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-libtool/2006-06/msg00001.html
Wow. That compiler is from June 2000! http://h21007.www2.hp.com/dspp/tech/tech_TechDocumentDetailPage_IDX/1,1701,1255,00.html -- albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) _______________________________________________ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
