Slooowly cycling through the list.. * Alexandre Oliva wrote on Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 01:05:59AM CET: > On Jan 27, 2005, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Which systems do actually need libtool's --fallback-echo? > > Probably ones that didn't support shell functions either.
Nope. The answer was in info '(autoconf.info)Here-Documents' all the time, I just needed to read carefully enough. :) > I don't recall exactly which systems required --fallback-echo, but I > do recall it was added for a very good reason, given how disgusting it > is :-) ACK. > Since we've now moved on to better systems, supporting shell functions > and all, we might as well give libtool a new try without this gunk and > see how it goes. Failing that, a shell function might be good enough, *snip* Naah, no need to kill something while it supposedly still works reasonably well and actually _might_ be of use to somebody. We'll just wait another seven years. :) Regards, Ralf _______________________________________________ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
