* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 04:37:38PM CET: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > 10. More testcases. Faster test suite. Please submit test cases for > > stuff that does not work. > > I was thinking about this myself while working on Autotestifying things. > I think there is a lot of room to build our testcases without resort to > autoreconfing a whole project. These tests are good too, but I think > that a lot of the things we want to test are in libtool alone, so we > ought to be able to write a Makefile that calls $(top_builddir)/libtool > directly to perform various build tests in a source tree... > > I plan to tackle this as I rewrite the testsuite post-2.0.
Great. While we're at the testsuite: the current HEAD new testsuite does not source atconfig (at least in the VPATH case), so $abs_top_builddir is not set, so $LIBTOOLIZE is bogus. Do we need to have the complicated setup where the Makefile generation rules for `testsuite' are in the toplevel, but the testsuite dir is `tests'? Also the results of $LIBTOOLIZE and autoreconf and configure in AT_BOOTSTRAP are not checked (on purpose?). Regards, Ralf _______________________________________________ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
