Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
Yes, good point. How about `LT_SYS_MODULEEXT'?
With an LT_SYS_SHLIBEXT, we could factor away the `shrext_cmds' nonsense. The darwin code in ltmain.sh hardcodes dylib a fair amount at the moment, so we could clean that up to.
Sure, if you want to make an LT_SYS_SHLIBEXT too it is just a case of copy and pasting and changing module=yes to module=no :)
I only found two mentions of "dylib", both in the same block of code. I'll change those next week sometime if you like.
Since we're talking about Mac OS X and libtool, I'd still like to change the library_names_spec to be just two libs instead of three :-p.
Peter -- Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com
_______________________________________________ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
