On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, S. Brent Faulkner wrote: > Is there any particular version, label, etc.? > > Or do I just go with the latest and hope that it's stable?
The latest works for me. Stability is difficult to define for software that is under development. > Also, are there any compatability issues with regard to automake, > autoconf, etc.? It is best to use recent automake (1.6 or later), and a modern Autoconf is nice (might be required by Automake). Bob > -----Original Message----- > From: Bob Friesenhahn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: February 18, 2003 1:14 PM > To: S. Brent Faulkner > Subject: Re: libtool.m4 and support for CC -xar on solaris > > > You need the CVS version of libtool to support C++ properly. > > Bob > > On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, S. Brent Faulkner wrote: > > > > > I've installed libtool-1.4.3 on Solaris 8 (Solaris 8 2/02 s28s_u7wosa > > SPARC). > > > > I'm using the native C++ compiler (CC: WorkShop Compilers 5.0 02/10/08 > > C++ 5.0 Path 107311-19). > > > > The CVS log for libtool.m4 seems to show the support for using CC -xar > > > -o ... instead of ar to create a static library, and the support > > appeasr to have been there for ages. > > > > However, the copy of libtool.m4 (link to libinclude.m4) in the > > libtool-1.4.3.tar.gz that I installed from doesn't have the CC -xar > > support. > > > > Can someone tell me what version of libtool I need (or what patch I > > need to apply)? > > > > Thanks. > > > > --Brent > > > > ====================================== > Bob Friesenhahn > [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen > ====================================== Bob Friesenhahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen _______________________________________________ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
