Re: ANSIfy GCC

[Bruce Korb]

FYA:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-01/msg00594.html

Title: Neil Booth - Re: ANSIfy cp/parser.c

This is the mail archive of the 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailing list for the GCC project.








  
Index Nav:
      

        [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
      
  
  
Message Nav:
      
[Date Prev] [Date Next]
      
[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
  
  
Other format:
  
[Raw text]
  






Re: ANSIfy cp/parser.c



From: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk>
To: Mike Stump <mstump at apple dot com>
Cc: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>,Nathanael Nerode <neroden at twcny dot rr dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 21:31:13 +0000
Subject: Re: ANSIfy cp/parser.c
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>






Mike Stump wrote:-

> Sun dropped /bin/cc, and we managed.  10 years to take up a new 
> standard seems like plenty enough time, I say we announce that in 3.4 
> we mandate a C89+ compiler, and just do it.  This will cause far fewer 
> problems, and those problems will be trivial to work around, when 
> compared to the new C++ parser, which we've already done.

Hear hear.

Neil.







Follow-Ups:

Re: ANSIfy cp/parser.c
From: Phil Edwards



References:

Re: ANSIfy cp/parser.c
From: Zack Weinberg
Re: ANSIfy cp/parser.c
From: Mike Stump





  
Index Nav:
      

        [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
      
  
  
Message Nav:
      
[Date Prev] [Date Next]
      
[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
  








_______________________________________________
Libtool mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool