All, Hey, that's a relief, now we don't have to deal with this issue anymore. I would be in favor of a) leaving the shell functions in place, and b) making use of them more. Thanks,
Robert Bruce Korb wrote: > > Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: > > > Bruce> ... 20 year old shells are [not] too old for continued > > Bruce> support. Ick. How completely disgusting. > > > > Cheer up and read the Autoconf 2.54c announcement entirely :) > > You're right. I only read the first 100 lines or so. :-) > This is a decade overdue. ;-) But still, at the usual > release rate, libtool's use is still over the horizon. :-( > > _______________________________________________ > Libtool-patches mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool-patches _______________________________________________ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
