> > With the link line fully qualified with all of the system libraries and > objects you could just use ld directly. It would be better, IMO, though > to remove the system libraries from the link command and allow g[cc|++] > to add the appropriate system libraries so that if some new system > library is added, the package won't need to worry about it. > > Earnie. >
AAACK! Oh no, that is definitely the compiler's job, I'm not going to jump on a bandwagon of tracking every additional link flag tacked on by every C++ compiler on the planet, Libtool is hard enough to maintain as it is. Clearly the compiler should be able to link a shared library, if not, it is broken. The only thing that troubles me about the link line Bob posted is that a .dll is specified in the link, not the corresponding .lib. I'm not a Windows guru, but I thought that you never link to a dll directly, but to the .lib that is created when the dll is. HTH, Robert -- Robert Boehne Software Engineer Ricardo Software Chicago Technical Center TEL: (630)789-0003 x. 238 FAX: (630)789-0127 email: rboehne AT ricardo-us DOT com _______________________________________________ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
