> > Yes, you already said that. The stuff above is about the libtool 1.4 > > _branch_, while the libtool-darwin patch is in the mainstream > development tree. > > Right, and I have not yet seen anything that said there will be a > libtool 1.4.3 release, only that there will be a libtool release in > general, so I posted the patch against the tree that it sounds like most > development is going on in. It should be very easy to backport.
Right. The ltmain.in patch works without modifications, the libtool.m4 patch had to be modified. I am using it now. I've attached a diff against native libtool 1.4.2. I hope, someone puts it into CVS. > > BTW: When will the first libtool version be released containing the > > libtool-darwin patch officially? > > Got me, this is the first time I've ever even written anything to the > libtool list I think, I'm just a lurker. =) > > I don't even know if anyone with commit access has looked at the patch, > for that matter. Would be nice, if someone were doing it. -- CU, Christoph Egger E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] +++ GMX - Mail, Messaging & more http://www.gmx.net +++ NEU: Mit GMX ins Internet. Rund um die Uhr für 1 ct/ Min. surfen!
libtool-darwin.diff
Description: Binary data
