On Tue, 2002-09-17 at 08:11, Max Bowsher wrote: > Max Bowsher wrote: > > Robert Boehne wrote: > > > Max, > > > > > > I took a look at the patch, and I don't have any objections > > > to it being checked in to Libtool. Can I get some comment > > > from the mingwin people before I take the leap and > > > check it in? > > Oh, and just thought of something else. That patch was against the latest Cygwin > release of libtool, which contains the following patch to libtool.m4. The 2nd > hunk is of particular importance, because I borrow that code for use on mingw as > well as Cygwin. I will try and get in contact with the Cygwin libtool maintainer > and ask that this patch be submitted for merge with mainline libtool.
Well, thats' kinda Chuck, kinda me. I did most of the original tweaks we have in libtool/cygwin, Chuck wrote the wrapper scripts, and we both worked to get as much as we where happy with ported upstream via Gary. I'm short on cycles at the moment, got a cygwin queue of patches to review a mile long, and Chuck's on holiday. So... If the libtool maintainers are happy with that patch as it stands, be our guests. Commit it :}. If you need a copyright assignment, I've already done one, but that specific patch isn't mine :[. I'm not sure whose it is either. Rob _______________________________________________ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
