[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> i'm interested in finding out how stable libltdl API is.
The core lt_dlinit/lt_dlopen/lt_dlsym/lt_dlclose/lt_dlexit API remains unchanged since
its original introduction into libtool releases.
> has it changed much in its history?
New calls have been added to exploit richer semantics and new features over the
years... user loader discipline management, library search path maintenance etc.
> do the Authors think it will change much in its future?
I am sure that new features will continue to creep in over time, and new API entry
points will be added, but I would be very surprised if binary compatibility were
broken.
Cheers,
Gary.
--
())_. Gary V. Vaughan gary@(oranda.demon.co.uk|gnu.org)
( '/ Research Scientist http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk ,_())____
/ )= GNU Hacker http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool \' `&
`(_~)_ Tech' Author http://sources.redhat.com/autobook =`---d__/
_______________________________________________
Libtool mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
